Senators Challenge TikTok Over Plans To Collect Users’ Face And Voiceprints

Congress is once again challenging TikTok.

News that the platform has changed its terms of service to allow the collection of faceprints and voiceprints has prompted concerns from both Democrat and Republican lawmakers this week.

Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and John Thune (R-SD) are asking TikTok to respond to a number of concerns by Aug. 25–namely what biometric data it’s collecting from users, and what it plans to do with that data.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

TikTok changed its privacy policy on June 2 to state that it “may collect biometric identifiers and biometric information as defined under US laws, such as faceprints and voiceprints.” This change appears to have been made quietly, with no announcement or other highlighting from TikTok.

Klobuchar and Thune, in a letter to TikTok’s CEO Shou Zi Chew, said they are particularly concerned with whether biometric data will be scraped from users under 18.

“The coronavirus pandemic led to an increase in online activity, which has magnified the need to protect consumers’ privacy,” the senators wrote. “This is especially true for children and teenagers, who comprise more than 32 percent of TikTok’s active users and have relied on online applications such as TikTok for entertainment and for interaction with their friends and loved ones.”

Klobuchar and Thune’s letter asks TikTok to explicitly define what it means by “faceprint” and “voiceprint,” and to state: whether data will be collected from users under 18; whether collected data will be shared with third parties; how long data will be stored after it’s collected; and whether faceprints/voiceprints can be used to accurately suss out identifying data about users, like age, gender, race, and ethnicity.

The letter also asks TikTok to say whether its recommendation algorithm will use the faceprints/voiceprints to serve content and/or ads, and asks for a list of all entities that will have access to users’ biometric data.

Tubefilter has reached out to TikTok for comment on the letter, and will update this story with any new information.

It’s absolutely worth mentioning here that TikTok just paid $92 million to settle a class-action lawsuit from 21 U.S.-based plaintiffs who alleged it illegally harvested underage users’ data–including scans of their faces–to feed its recommendation algorithm.

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: tiktok

Recent Posts

After cutting 15% of staff and saying goodbye to its CEO, Peloton must figure out what’s next

Peloton is dismissing a chunk of its workforce, including its top executive. Barry McCarthy announced that he is…

15 hours ago

Meta is using AI to power brand and creator matchmaking on Facebook and Instagram

Meta is looking to improve creator and brand experiences on its platform by investing in AI. The…

15 hours ago

Bob Does Sports cracks a cold one with new “Have a Day” tequila line

Bob Does Sports, the self-dubbed home of "brilliantly dumb sporting adventures" hosted by Robby Berger,…

16 hours ago

Billion Dollar Boy launches biz dev community for creators with flagship location in London

Influencer marketing agency Billion Dollar Boy is launching a new membership community that's "dedicated to…

17 hours ago

Millionaires: Giulia Amato on faith, finding her niche, and getting up at 4 a.m.

Welcome to Millionaires, where we profile creators who have recently crossed the one million follower…

20 hours ago

Creators on the Rise: Celestial Sylvia reads the danger all around us

Welcome to Creators on the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are…

2 days ago