Recent Study Shows What It Takes To Be A YouTube Star

What do the top YouTube channels have in common? What do they all do? What do none of them do? These questions (and many, many others) were answered in a recent study conducted by a group of students at Columbia College in Chicago. The study analyzes the top 241 YouTube channels, breaking them down a million different ways in order to uncover the practices that allowed them to acquire such large fanbases.

YouTube is often thought of as a place where short videos thrive, but the site’s top contributors don’t tend to keep things so brief. The average video length among the top channels is 4:19, well above the snappy runtime we associate with YouTube. At first, this number seems skewed by gaming Let’s Play videos and makeup tutorials, both of which are common in the top channels and often run for more than ten minutes. However, even videos from popular comedy channels have an average length of 3:25. In terms of accruing subscribers, this data suggests that producing regular episodic content is more important that keeping it brief.

Another interesting nugget from the study discusses YouTube ‘trends’ such as the ‘Harlem Shake’. The study

looked at several recent videos from the top creators and determined the ratio of comments to views. The most engaging channels had about 10% as many comments as views. On the other hand, two notable creators, The Fine Bros and Shane Dawson, found themselves with  a view/comment ratio of less than .1%. The study explains that these low ratios occurred because the studied videos were Harlem Shake videos rather than regular content. This fact creates an interesting dynamic: While following trends on YouTube can bring in outside viewers who are interested in the latest fad, such a practice does a poor job of actually engaging the audience. Instead, it is The Fine Bros’ and Shane Dawson’s regularly scheduled content that creates a passionate fanbase.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

These findings make it clear that, while shooting for virality can lead to short term success, those hoping to gain subscribers must focus on producing a consistent product. There is much more data in the study; were I to analyze all of it, I’d end up looking like Charles Darwin. Peruse it at your leisure by checking it out here.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Soccer media brand Footballco is coming to America with several key hires

Footballco is betting on the growth of soccer in the United States. Over the past few…

1 day ago

MatPat-founded Theroist reveals new apparel brand at ‘Creator in Fashion’ show

As the co-host of the Creators in Fashion show that took place on April 25, Matthew Patrick (a.k.a. MatPat)…

1 day ago

YouTube salutes its Shorts as ad revenue soars to $8.1 billion in Q1 2024

Alphabet's earnings report for the first quarter of 2024 sent its stock price soaring sky-high.…

1 day ago

Snap stock jumps 25% after Q1 earnings beat projections. Also, 9 million people are now paying for Snapchat+.

Snap has had a rocky couple of years: several quarters of flat growth or declines,…

1 day ago

On the Rise: Rob can heal your workplace wounds

Welcome to On the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are in…

2 days ago

Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint launch Spy Ninjas HQ, the first adventure park built on a YouTube IP

Four years ago, Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint had an idea. They had spent…

2 days ago