X adds Twitch to lawsuit accusing advertisers of anticompetitive practices

Two of the web’s biggest social platforms are set to go head-to-head in court. has added Twitch to the list of defendants in a lawsuit that accuses advertisers of anticompetitive practices.

The allegations in the lawsuit — which X initially filed back in August — stem from a widespread advertiser boycott that took place in 2022 on the platform then known as Twitter. The chaotic early days of Elon Musk‘s reign as X Chairman, as well as Musk’s apparent facilitation of hate speech on the platform, led numerous brands and agencies to withdraw or scale back their X ad efforts.

The suit attributes the boycott to The Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), an initiative put together by the World Federation of Advertisers (WFA). That’s where Twitch enters the story. The Amazon-owned streaming hub was affiliated with GARM, which was discontinued in the wake of the X lawsuit. Despite the shutdown, WFA CEO Stephan Loerke said in August that his team would “demonstrate our full adherence to competition rules in all of our activites.”

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

An undeterred X is now arguing that Twitch is one of the companies that colluded to withhold billions of ad dollars from the Musk-led platform. That “marked departure” from previous activity, the lawsuit claims, has continued in the years following the boycott. Twitch has reportedly refrained from buying any X ads in the U.S. since 2022 while endorsing GARM and its brand safety standards.

Musk’s prominent position in Donald Trump‘s reelection campaign has increased his power considerably, but X is still struggling to win back advertisers who bristled at its previous activity. Even though X has provided greater transparency on its moderation efforts and has rolled out premium products for advertisers, it is expected to continue facing the reality of declining budgets in 2025 — even if CEO Linda Yaccarino personally courts agencies in an attempt to win them back.

The outcome of the ad boycott lawsuit may give X another surface-level win, like the one it got when the WFA discontinued GARM. But Twitch’s activity on X post-2022 shows that buyers are still treading lightly on Elon Musk’s personal playground, so X may need to continue searching for more alternative revenue streams it can provide to its creator community.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Have you heard? Kurzgesagt is not AI, John Nellis goes dancing, and Baby Shark’s K-pop idol.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

2 hours ago

As social media lawsuits move forward, is Section 230 facing an existential threat?

In 2026, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is celebrating its 30th birthday. At…

3 hours ago

The World Cup put creators on the broadcast. Can KSI replicate that strategy for the club he co-owns?

When Greater London soccer club Dagenham & Redbridge FC begins its campaign for the 2026-27 season,…

6 hours ago

Spotify is cracking down on AI slop, but prompters can still post their generated music if they build a personal brand around it

Spotify is adding its own "seems like AI slop" button. Like YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, and…

19 hours ago

OnlyFans investor says it will “never use AI in any capacity to disrupt creators”

OnlyFans' newest investor is talking up his future plans for the platform--including promising that it…

20 hours ago

Influencer endorsements have created a campaign finance loophole. A proposed law would close it.

At this point, it's become clear that social media creators will play pivotal roles in…

1 day ago