Did federal authorities violate the Constitution by asking Google to turn over viewer data?

An investigation into a potential case of money laundering has triggered complaints from privacy advocates. According to a Forbes report, federal authorities asked Google to turn over viewer data on specific videos as part of an inquiry into a Bitcoin vendor.

Forbes uncovered the federal request after examining court documents that were recently unsealed. According to the subsequent report, authorities solicited viewer data related to videos that has been seen more than 30,000 times. An undercover agent had previously shared the videos with a Bitcoin trader named elonmuskwhm, who was suspected of illegally selling cryptocurrency for cash.

By gathering names, addresses, telephone numbers, and user activity of YouTube accounts, as well as the IP addresses of the videos’ viewers, authorities could obtain insights about elonmuskwhm’s identity. But some privacy advocates have contended that the request violated the civil liberties of video viewers who may have had no relationship with elonmuskwhm.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

“What we watch online can reveal deeply sensitive information about us—our politics, our passions, our religious beliefs, and much more,” Electronic Privacy Information Center Senior Counsel John Davisson told Forbes. “It’s fair to expect that law enforcement won’t have access to that information without probable cause. This order turns that assumption on its head.”

According to the court documents, authorities requested that Google hand over viewer data for a period that ran from January 1-8, 2023. Forbes could not confirm whether Google complied with the demand, though a spokesperson for the tech giant clarified its practices related to data security.

“With all law enforcement demands, we have a rigorous process designed to protect the privacy and constitutional rights of our users while supporting the important work of law enforcement,” the spokesperson told Forbes. “We examine each demand for legal validity, consistent with developing case law, and we routinely push back against over broad or otherwise inappropriate demands for user data, including objecting to some demands entirely.”

Google has taken some steps to prevent the privacy of user data. A policy introduced last December, for example, shortened the window of availability for location data.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Soccer media brand Footballco is coming to America with several key hires

Footballco is betting on the growth of soccer in the United States. Over the past few…

14 hours ago

MatPat-founded Theroist reveals new apparel brand at ‘Creator in Fashion’ show

As the co-host of the Creators in Fashion show that took place on April 25, Matthew Patrick (a.k.a. MatPat)…

15 hours ago

YouTube salutes its Shorts as ad revenue soars to $8.1 billion in Q1 2024

Alphabet's earnings report for the first quarter of 2024 sent its stock price soaring sky-high.…

17 hours ago

Snap stock jumps 25% after Q1 earnings beat projections. Also, 9 million people are now paying for Snapchat+.

Snap has had a rocky couple of years: several quarters of flat growth or declines,…

18 hours ago

On the Rise: Rob can heal your workplace wounds

Welcome to On the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are in…

2 days ago

Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint launch Spy Ninjas HQ, the first adventure park built on a YouTube IP

Four years ago, Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint had an idea. They had spent…

2 days ago