News

Trying to cure your allergies on YouTube? You might want to check your sources.

YouTube’s efforts to curb misinformation on its platform are well-documented. But what about semi-truthful videos that aren’t politically motivated? Those clips are the subject of a recent study published by the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. The ACAAI looked at 86 videos about allergic rhinitis — i.e. hay fever — and found that 36% of them contained “misleading” information.

To collect the sample for the study, researchers looked up the YouTube results for strings like “allergic rhinitis,” “hay fever,” and “allergy.” Some videos in the study — especially those that came from doctors or medical associations — conveyed accurate information. But nearly 40% of the surfaced videos originated from TV shows or non-doctoral YouTube channels, and nearly half of those clips contained misleading statements. The researchers only deemed 29% of the videos in that category “useful.”

The statements that were characterized as misleading sometimes promoted alternative treatments. One video was flagged for offering “specific instructions to make your own natural remedy to cure your hay fever.” Another questionable clip “informs that one can get relief by means of pressure in a certain place in the face.”

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

“According to research, 70% of patients with a chronic disease are influenced by information they get from online sources, and one-quarter of internet users have watched an online video about a health or medical problem,” said Celine Lund-Nielsen Remvig, BSc, the lead author on the study. “Our study found that YouTube viewers may be unable to distinguish scientifically based information from misinformation.”

If you’re going to get medical advice from YouTube, you should already know to take the information you find with a grain of salt. This study is a reminder that inaccurate information doesn’t just originate from politically-motivated videos. The COVID-related conspiracy theories may get all the headlines, but erroneous details can pop up anywhere. That’s what happens when any can “share information regardless of the scientific grounds,” as the study puts it.

You can check out the complete study by clicking here.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

YouTube’s new public viewcounts over-report actual engagement by 40%

YouTube's new public viewcounts over-report engagement by 40%, according to new data from Agentio. As…

1 day ago

Have you heard? Another YouTuber on Netflix, Dude Perfect’s CEO shuffle, and a cow gamer.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

1 day ago

Bottoms up! Google is bringing personalization to alcohol ads on YouTube.

On YouTube, ads for alcoholic beverages are few and far between -- but that's about to…

1 day ago

TikTok has new ways to comment (that make it feel more like Instagram)

TikTok is trying to turn its comments into an interactive format. The app has unveiled several…

1 day ago

GTA RP Week returns to Twitch, with Rockstar promoting “the next evolution of the GTA 5 roleplay community”

Rockstar doesn't put out games very often. Grand Theft Auto VI is about to debut…

2 days ago

After spending decades in Hollywood, UTA’s Co-Founder has a new gig: A call-in show on Twitch.

What do you do if you’re a Hollywood lifer who is without a full-time job…

2 days ago