YouTube

Susan Wojcicki Says YouTube Won’t Remove Politicians’ Content Because “It’s Important For Other People To See”

YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter all have one thing in common: while they can be quick to ban or suppress regular users for violating (or appearing to violate) site-wide rules, they seem to have different policies for dealing with content from political figures.

“When you have a political officer that is making information that is really important for their constituents to see, or for other global leaders to see, that is content that we would leave up because we think it’s important for other people to see,” Wojcicki said this morning, speaking onstage at The Atlantic Festival.

She also said that, because the media will cover policy-breaking content whether it’s taken down or not, news stories will provide context for viewers to understand politicians’ videos. Additionally, she cited YouTube’s policies of leaving up certain content that may violate Community Guidelines, but is still educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic in nature.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

YouTube tells Tubefilter it removes content that violates its policies, including content uploaded by politicians.

Politicians being permitted to remain on social media sites despite violating their respective policies has been a topic of conversation since Donald Trump

was elected. As president, he’s repeatedly used his Twitter account to disseminate false and/or racist statements, target fellow politicians, and potentially declare war on North Korea in a 2017 incident that originally prompted Twitter to clarify it has a separate set of considerations for politicians’ tweets.

During that incident, Twitter said it keeps rule-breaking accounts and/or tweets around if they’re judged to be newsworthy or “of public interest.” Then, this past June, Twitter tweaked how it treats those accounts and tweets, adding a feature that automatically hides rule-breaking-yet-newsworthy tweets with a warning that viewers must click through to read the tweet.

And just yesterday, Facebook confirmed that it, too, will generally not remove political figures’ rule-breaking posts from its site. The company’s official statement, as reported by The Verge, is that “it is not our role to intervene when politicians speak.” Facebook did add, however, that it might still remove politicians’ posts if the content could “lead to real-world violence and harm.”

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: YouTube

Recent Posts

Have you heard? A ‘Dead Meat’ meetup, Jake Paul’s re-raise, and the TikTok farlands.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

2 days ago

YouTube Shorts has a new look that removes distractions and dislikes

It's hard to believe it's already been more than five years since YouTube Shorts was…

2 days ago

Twitch partners with Soundcloud to put a new spin on DJ sets

Both YouTube and TikTok have flexed their music industry muscles by attaching their names to star-studded…

2 days ago

Second Rodeo’s Scott Brown says a new age of creator-fronted scripted content is here–and vertical microseries like Playback are leading the charge

With microseries drawing big attention and big investment from startup studios and legacy entertainment entities…

3 days ago

YouTube creator content now appears in 25% of AI chatbot responses

According to new research from Jellyfish, creators are becoming vital sources for AI chatbots, whether they…

3 days ago

The Knicks’ victory lap has scored billions of views. Advertisers should pay attention.

On June 13, the New York Knicks ended a 53-year title drought by defeating the San Antonio Spurs…

3 days ago