YouTube

Susan Wojcicki Says YouTube Won’t Remove Politicians’ Content Because “It’s Important For Other People To See”

YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter all have one thing in common: while they can be quick to ban or suppress regular users for violating (or appearing to violate) site-wide rules, they seem to have different policies for dealing with content from political figures.

“When you have a political officer that is making information that is really important for their constituents to see, or for other global leaders to see, that is content that we would leave up because we think it’s important for other people to see,” Wojcicki said this morning, speaking onstage at The Atlantic Festival.

She also said that, because the media will cover policy-breaking content whether it’s taken down or not, news stories will provide context for viewers to understand politicians’ videos. Additionally, she cited YouTube’s policies of leaving up certain content that may violate Community Guidelines, but is still educational, documentary, scientific, or artistic in nature.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

YouTube tells Tubefilter it removes content that violates its policies, including content uploaded by politicians.

Politicians being permitted to remain on social media sites despite violating their respective policies has been a topic of conversation since Donald Trump

was elected. As president, he’s repeatedly used his Twitter account to disseminate false and/or racist statements, target fellow politicians, and potentially declare war on North Korea in a 2017 incident that originally prompted Twitter to clarify it has a separate set of considerations for politicians’ tweets.

During that incident, Twitter said it keeps rule-breaking accounts and/or tweets around if they’re judged to be newsworthy or “of public interest.” Then, this past June, Twitter tweaked how it treats those accounts and tweets, adding a feature that automatically hides rule-breaking-yet-newsworthy tweets with a warning that viewers must click through to read the tweet.

And just yesterday, Facebook confirmed that it, too, will generally not remove political figures’ rule-breaking posts from its site. The company’s official statement, as reported by The Verge, is that “it is not our role to intervene when politicians speak.” Facebook did add, however, that it might still remove politicians’ posts if the content could “lead to real-world violence and harm.”

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: YouTube

Recent Posts

YouTube and TikTok darling EPIC: The Musical headed for the big screen with Jerry Bruckheimer

EPIC, the modern musical retelling of The Odyssey which generated so much viewer support on…

1 hour ago

Are in-browser game demos Twitch’s entry into the booming live shopping industry?

If you could watch a streamer play a game and then try it out for yourself…

2 hours ago

Tiffany La’Ryn turned her six sons into her costars–and her YouTube channel into a source of generational security

Just a few years ago, Tiffany La'Ryn was working at a bank. But she didn't…

3 hours ago

Gen Z and Millennials “consistently converge” on YouTube, where they have better recall and find the best quality ads, according to Precisify’s new data

"In an increasingly fragmented media ecosystem, YouTube has become the backbone of modern audience planning…

14 hours ago

Have you heard? YouTube mogs Clavicular, iGumdrop is a ‘MasterChef’, and ‘me at the zoo’ turns 21

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

3 days ago

Students have become a scarce resource. Can schools use TikTok to combat the demographic cliff?

In the world of academia, a demographic cliff is looming, and TikTok might be the most reliable…

3 days ago