Categories: Twitter

Twitter Founder Jack Dorsey Explains Why Twitter Isn’t Banning Alex Jones

YouTube, Facebook, Spotify, and Apple have all taken actions against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his site Infowars this week, removing large amounts of content citing violations of hate speech policies. One prominent tech platform, however, is not in the aforementioned list.

Twitter announced Tuesday it would not ban Jones or Infowars accounts from its service or its livestreaming platform Periscope, with a Twitter spokesperson indicating in a statement that troubling content posted by a particular user on non-Twitter sites doesn’t always wind up on that user’s Twitter account, and therefore can’t be acted upon by Twitter.

After Twitter faced immediate backlash, founder Jack Dorsey further explained the company’s decision in a series of tweets Tuesday evening. “We know that’s hard for many, but the reason is simple: he hasn’t violated our rules. We’ll enforce if he does.”

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

Dorsey added, “Truth is we’ve been terrible at explaining our decisions in the past. We’re fixing that. We’re going to hold Jones to the same standard we hold to every account, not taking one-off actions to make us feel good in the short term, and adding fuel to new conspiracy theories.”

Jones, who has boosted conspiracy theories including one (for which he is currently being sued) that alleges the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., was faked by the government, gave statements to The Washington Post after Sunday/Monday’s mass content removal, calling it a “a counter-strike against the global awakening.”

Dorsey further tweeted that Twitter as a company wants to avoid becoming “a service that’s constructed by our personal views. […] Accounts like Jones’ can often sensationalize issues and unsubstantiated rumors, so it’s critical journalists document, validate, and refute such information directly so people can form their own opinions. This is what serves the public conversation best.”

Concerns about how Twitter decides who to suspend, ban, and “shadowban” (a form of ban that doesn’t remove a user’s account, but prevents anyone but the user from seeing their posts) have been surging in past months, with some users alleging Twitter does not always apply its policies equally.

Share
Published by
James Hale

Recent Posts

After cutting 15% of staff and saying goodbye to its CEO, Peloton must figure out what’s next

Peloton is dismissing a chunk of its workforce, including its top executive. Barry McCarthy announced that he is…

2 days ago

Meta is using AI to power brand and creator matchmaking on Facebook and Instagram

Meta is looking to improve creator and brand experiences on its platform by investing in AI. The…

2 days ago

Bob Does Sports cracks a cold one with new “Have a Day” tequila line

Bob Does Sports, the self-dubbed home of "brilliantly dumb sporting adventures" hosted by Robby Berger,…

2 days ago

Billion Dollar Boy launches biz dev community for creators with flagship location in London

Influencer marketing agency Billion Dollar Boy is launching a new membership community that's "dedicated to…

2 days ago

Millionaires: Giulia Amato on faith, finding her niche, and getting up at 4 a.m.

Welcome to Millionaires, where we profile creators who have recently crossed the one million follower…

2 days ago

Creators on the Rise: Celestial Sylvia reads the danger all around us

Welcome to Creators on the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are…

3 days ago