Facebook

Facebook Paying Users To Shut Down Their Accounts For Science Ahead Of The 2020 Election

With the Cambridge Analytica scandal still–and likely forever–hanging over its head, Facebook has spent much of the past year hyping its efforts to preserve electoral integrity ahead of the 2020 presidential vote.

Now, as part of those efforts, it’s offering to pay users to shutter their accounts during the leadup to the election.

According to screenshots of a notice Facebook sent to some users, the social network is surveying people about how much they’d need to be compensated to temporarily deactivate their Facebook and/or Instagram accounts. Users who received the notice are asked to indicate whether they would accept $10, $15, or $20 per week their accounts are offline.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

The notice (tweeted out by Washington Post reporter Elizabeth Dwokin and spotted by The Verge) is part of Facebook’s newly launched research initiative to “better understand the impact of Facebook and Instagram on key political attitudes and behaviors during the U.S. 2020 elections.” Announced this week, the program involves numerous Facebook researchers, 17 external academics, and nonpartisan data science institution NORC

at the University of Chicago. They anticipate involving 200,000 to 400,000 Facebook/Instagram users in a “diverse set of studies,” the company said.

Users who participate in the shutdown study will have their accounts shuttered in late September for either one week or six weeks. After their deactivation period is over, they’ll answer a postmortem survey, for which they’ll also be compensated.

Liz Bourgeois, Facebook’s director of strategic response, responded to Dwokin’s tweet, saying that payment is “fairly standard for this type of academic research.”

Findings from this and other studies in the initiative aren’t expected until mid-2021. Facebook said it hopes to investigate a range of areas, including “whether social media makes us more polarized as a society, or if it largely reflects the divisions that already exist; if it helps people to become better informed about politics, or less; or if it affects people’s attitudes towards government and democracy, including whether and how they vote.”

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: facebook

Recent Posts

Have you heard? Ludwig’s ‘GeoGuessr’ fame, Poland’s record-setting stream, and an NFL prank gone wrong.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

2 days ago

Roblox hikes developer earnings by 42%–but only if they make games aimed at adults

Roblox is quadrupling down on chasing adult gamers--and rewarding developers who make games appealing to…

2 days ago

After FaZe Clan’s epic collapse, it’s CORE members are reuniting with a new creator group

Five months after FaZe Clan's collapse, some of its best-known alumni are looking to bring back…

2 days ago

TV production companies let creators use their game show formats. Then Squeezie flipped the script.

Creators have already made their mark in movie theaters and on Broadway stages. Now, they're…

2 days ago

Vine is back–and it has a zero-tolerance policy for creators using AI

Vine is back, and it's anti-AI. Jack Dorsey, co-founder and former multi-time CEO of Twitter,…

3 days ago

Spotify has a new use for “verified” check marks: They can identify human creators

On the internet, it's been a roller coaster ride for the humble check mark. At…

3 days ago