Facebook

Facebook’s splitting ad revenue with creators who use licensed songs

Creators who use songs by artists like Post Malone and Tove Lo in their Facebook videos can now earn 20% of in-stream ad revenue generated by those videos.

Meta, Facebook’s parent company, said the goal is to give “both creators and music rights holders a new way to earn money from videos on Facebook.”

Creators get the aforementioned 20%; the other 80% is split between Meta and music rightsholders. Meta wouldn’t say how much it’s getting versus how much rightsholders are getting, and told Variety that information isn’t public “due to confidentiality agreements with our partners.”

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

To be clear, creators won’t earn ad revenue by using any old song. They’ll only get a cut when they use songs from Facebook’s library of licensed tracks, which it’s collected by doing deals with record labels and rightsholders.

There are also limits to what kinds of videos can be monetized. Clips must also be at least 60 seconds, to start, and “there must be a visual component in the video as well; the licensed music itself cannot be its primary purpose,” Meta said.

This new program additionally does not apply to Reels. Those are still monetized through Meta’s Reels Play bonus program.

The program begins rolling out to video creators today. Meta says it will eventually be available to all video creators globally, but for now, U.S.-based creators are the only ones with access.

“[W]e’ll expand to the rest of the world where music is available on Facebook in the coming months,” the company said.

As The Verge points out, this announcement comes just a few days after royalty-free music platform Epidemic Sound filed suit against Meta, alleging that 1,000 of its song have been uploaded and in content across Instagram and Facebook without permission.

The suit alleges Meta’s tools for uploading new audio to Reels and for remixing existing Reels audio into new videos “encourage and allow its users to steal Epidemic’s music from another user’s posted video content and use in their own subsequent videos, resulting in exponential infringements on Meta’s platform, at Meta’s hands.”

On top of that, this past weekend, music publisher Kobalt let its licensing deal with Meta—which put 700,000 songs in Facebook’s and Instagram’s libraries—expire, and is removing its content from those platforms. In a letter to partners, it said it let the deal expire because “fundamental differences remained that we were not able to resolve in your best interests.”

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: facebookmeta

Recent Posts

MrBeast’s literary debut comes with a chance to win $1 million. Is that enough to make it a bestseller?

"The competition is a series of tests that are harder than anything you've seen. And…

12 hours ago

A new gamer on Twitch is so ‘OP’ that he’s taking on some of the biggest esports stars

Sandisk is challenging Twitch streamers to take on a masked gamer whose skills will shine across…

13 hours ago

A rumored FTC complaint would accuse YouTube of misrepresenting its content moderation policies

Do YouTube users have a clear understanding of the platform's policies when they sign up? Or are…

13 hours ago

Will they or won’t they? The Chicago Cubs’ TikTok rom-com could be a punchline or a sign of the times.

Will the next sports romance sensation come from TikTok? The Chicago Cubs are looking to hit a…

15 hours ago

Here’s how Collab used licensed clips and human voiceovers to turn Rufus Goodboy into YouTube’s best-in-show animal compilation channel

Thanks to its core business--collecting, licensing, managing, and protecting the usage rights of user-generated content--Collab…

16 hours ago

Markiplier thinks GoPro’s new $699 camera is the key to accessible filmmaking. (Also, he’s now GoPro’s biggest shareholder.)

This past April, Markiplier went to GoPro's booth at NAB Show in Las Vegas, hoping…

1 day ago