News

Two U.K. YouTubers Fined $330,000 For Promoting Video Game Gambling To Minors

Two U.K. YouTube stars were fined hundreds of thousands of dollars for promoting illegal video game gambling. The creators, 33-year-old Dylan Rigby, whose FutGalaxy channel has since been deleted, and 32-year-old Craig Douglas, whose NepentheZ channel counts roughly 1.5 million subscribers, plead guilty to promoting a website — also dubbed FutGalaxy — that enabled minors to gamble on real-life pro soccer matches using a virtual currency earned through FIFA, the popular video game.

Rigby was fined roughly $218,000 for not having a gambling license as well as for knowingly promoting the site to children, while Douglas must pay $114,000 for the latter charge.

“The aggravating features of these offenses are they were committed over a relatively long period of about six months,” district judge Jack McGarva said in his ruling, per The Guardian. “In my opinion, both of you were aware of the use of the site by children and the attractiveness of it to children.” One 14-year-old user, for instance, is said to have lost about $730 in a single day.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

Following the ruling, Douglas tweeted, “The worst year of my life concluded today. I have so much to say, but you’ll take whatever judgement you feel needed from the press.” He noted that he would be making a video to share his side of the story in due time. “I also owe a huge apology and debt of gratitude to my loyal supporters,” he concluded. “Even if this is the end of our journey together, I’m grateful.”

The case against Rigby and Douglas marks the first time that the U.K. Gambling Commission brought charges against a video game gambling website. But other YouTubers, too, have come under fire for dodgy practices in the realm of video game gambling. The Syndicate Project and TmarTn, for instance, were accused by fellow YouTubers of promoting a gambling website for the first-person shooter game Counter Strike: Global Offensive without disclosing that they owned it. Both later amended disclaimers on their channels, and apologized for not being more transparent.

Share
Published by
Geoff Weiss

Recent Posts

Fox’s new digital IP division is giving creators cash, ads, and distribution to make their next hit series

There's been a lot of chatter lately about the increasing interweave of the creator industry…

1 day ago

At VidCon, a pickleball competition will bring more visibility to creator sports tours

Creators have already established themselves as the next generation of professional sports broadcasters. Can they…

2 days ago

Epic Games has now paid over $1 billion to the creators of Fortnite’s “Islands”

Three years after Epic Games launched the Unreal Editor for Fortnite (UEFN), creator payouts associated…

2 days ago

The British Film Institute’s video archive will preserve the weird and wild sides of web culture

The British Film Institute is committing to the preservation of internet history, no matter how…

3 days ago

Uscreen has helped content creators make over $1 billion with membership programs, white-label apps, and more

Here in 2026, the global content creator economy is a $250 billion juggernaut that grows…

3 days ago

Report: Nearly 60% of videos recommended to new TikTok accounts are AI slop

YouTube has taken some steps to reduce the volume of AI slop on its platform,…

3 days ago