UK Watchdog Goes After Beauty Videos Sponsored By Procter & Gamble

Recently, we’ve noted a number of instances in which watchdog agencies flagged YouTube videos that were not properly marked as brand-sponsored marketing tools. The latest channel under fire from the UK’s Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) is Beauty Recommended, where a video hosted by vlogger Ruth Crilly had to be removed because it did not properly note that it was sponsored by Procter & Gamble.

Beauty Recommended, which is run by P&G’s Max Factor brand, does include disclaimers at the beginning of all its videos. The ASA, however, does not believe those title cards provide enough information. “It wasn’t until a viewer had selected and opened the video that text, embedded in the video, referred to Procter & Gamble,” the ASA said. “We considered that viewers should have been aware of the commercial nature of the content prior to engagement.”

Beauty Recommended now tells viewers its videos are “brought to you by Procter & Gamble” as soon as they arrive on the channel. That step, however, may not be enough to satisfy the ASA. The advertising watchdog is also quibbling with the terms “sponsored by” and “brought to you by,” which it believes do not adequately inform viewers about videos on which the brands maintain editorial control.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

Crilly, who makes videos on her “A Model Recommends” YouTube channel, is one of several vloggers who contribute to Beauty Recommended, which presents beauty tips to its 18,000 subscribers.

This isn’t the first time the ASA has gone after the YouTube community. It previously went on the offensive against YouTube stars Dan Howell and Phil Lester, who it said did not properly mark videos sponsored by Oreo. On our side of the pond, children’s advocacy groups have attacked the YouTube Kids app, where they found videos they allege to be not properly marked as branded content.

Those previous examples underscored the importance of properly-marked branded content on YouTube. The new spat with Beauty Recommended contributes to the conversation by stressing the difference between sponsored content and what the ASA calls “marketing communications.” That distinction is another thing YouTubers and their brand partners will need to keep an eye on as branded content continues to spread across YouTube.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

TikTok’s new Events app rewards users for generating buzz about big events

With the World Cup fast approaching, TikTok is leveraging its position as FIFA's first ever…

19 hours ago

Netflix wants that BookTok watch time

Netflix has already been coming after YouTube with its bouquet of creator content signings and…

2 days ago

Meta’s new Reels feature plays into the microdrama market

As microseries take over digital content and Hollywood and YouTube leans ever harder into being…

2 days ago

Brands don’t benefit from playing it safe. Just ask IKEA, Chupa Chups, and their meatball-flavored lollipop.

Most brands would shy away from the idea of a campaign based around a meatball-flavored…

2 days ago

The first ‘Minecraft’ affiliate marketing program will add new dimensions to the sandbox game’s economy

If everything goes according to plan, Minecraft players are about to make more money than…

3 days ago