Freeplay Music Launches Counterclaims Against Machinima, Collective DS

Last month, multi-channel networks Machinima and Collective Digital Studio both launched lawsuits against Freeplay Music, a company that offers licensed background music for content creators. Now, Freeplay is fighting back. After launching claims against four MCNs on February 17th, Freeplay has added to its legal action will counterclaims against both Machinima and Collective DS, which, according to a statement, “have exploited hundreds of copyrights owned and/or controlled by Freeplay Music, LLC.”

Machinima and Collective DS’ original claims stated that Freeplay operated as a “copyright troll.” The two networks alleged their creators used Freeplay’s library in a manner they believed to be free of charge. Instead, Freeplay then teamed with a separate-but-related company, TuneSat, which helped it indentify infringing videos. Freeplay then forced the parties responsible for those videos to pay license fees in order to keep using the music in question.

When Freeplay launched legal action against BroadbandTV

, AwesomenessTV, Big Frame, and Maker Studios, it told a different story. The company claimed it was simply protecting its copyrighted material from “rampant infringements.” The counterclaims against Machinima and Collective DS contain a similar rationale:

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

“Freeplay notified Machinima and CDS of these infringements, just as any other copyright owner in any other industry would do.  But rather than pay Freeplay Music, Machinima and CDS responded by accusing Freeplay Music of ‘extortion’ and being a ‘copyright troll’—these accusations are false and only add insult to injury. Machinima’s and CDS’s systematic misappropriation of Freeplay Music’s copyrights without authorization has harmed our client. In this action we intend to protect our client’s rights and utilize the remedies and enforcement provisions provided by the Copyright Act.”

Clearly, Freeplay and the MCNs it is battling have very different ideas about this particular case. While we wait to see whose version of events the courts side with, we can only issue a reminder to creators: Be careful where you get your background music. In this case, it’s possible that Freeplay’s agreements with Apple’s DVD Studio Pro and Final Cut Pro editing software led some creators to believe those tracks were freely available without licenses. If you create videos for monetized distribution online, take this case as a cautionary tale.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Have you heard? 20 years of Super Simple Songs, AMP in the Club, and Shyamalan’s next twist.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

5 hours ago

Schrodinger’s platform: YouTube is TV, and it isn’t

The MacTaggart Lecture, hosted each year at the Edinburgh TV Festival, is one of the…

6 hours ago

As Netflix brings YouTube’s creators aboard, is it losing YouTube’s viewers?

Netflix is spending freely to bring some of YouTube's top channels into its library, prompting…

8 hours ago

Korean exports will become a $30 billion industry on TikTok by 2030. Welcome to “K-culture 4.0.”

If you thought the KPop Demon Hunters bonanza of 2025 represented the peak of Korean culture…

1 day ago

Answer engine optimization adds value to chatbot responses. Its catching on with creator marketers.

Creator agencies are helping brands navigate the nascent field of answer engine optimization (AEO). The latest companies…

1 day ago

YouTube and Amazon partner to let creators sell a “curated catalog of highly requested and trending products”

In his 2026 letter to creators, CEO Neal Mohan said YouTube is "focused on" making…

1 day ago