Recent Study Shows What It Takes To Be A YouTube Star

What do the top YouTube channels have in common? What do they all do? What do none of them do? These questions (and many, many others) were answered in a recent study conducted by a group of students at Columbia College in Chicago. The study analyzes the top 241 YouTube channels, breaking them down a million different ways in order to uncover the practices that allowed them to acquire such large fanbases.

YouTube is often thought of as a place where short videos thrive, but the site’s top contributors don’t tend to keep things so brief. The average video length among the top channels is 4:19, well above the snappy runtime we associate with YouTube. At first, this number seems skewed by gaming Let’s Play videos and makeup tutorials, both of which are common in the top channels and often run for more than ten minutes. However, even videos from popular comedy channels have an average length of 3:25. In terms of accruing subscribers, this data suggests that producing regular episodic content is more important that keeping it brief.

Another interesting nugget from the study discusses YouTube ‘trends’ such as the ‘Harlem Shake’. The study

looked at several recent videos from the top creators and determined the ratio of comments to views. The most engaging channels had about 10% as many comments as views. On the other hand, two notable creators, The Fine Bros and Shane Dawson, found themselves with  a view/comment ratio of less than .1%. The study explains that these low ratios occurred because the studied videos were Harlem Shake videos rather than regular content. This fact creates an interesting dynamic: While following trends on YouTube can bring in outside viewers who are interested in the latest fad, such a practice does a poor job of actually engaging the audience. Instead, it is The Fine Bros’ and Shane Dawson’s regularly scheduled content that creates a passionate fanbase.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

These findings make it clear that, while shooting for virality can lead to short term success, those hoping to gain subscribers must focus on producing a consistent product. There is much more data in the study; were I to analyze all of it, I’d end up looking like Charles Darwin. Peruse it at your leisure by checking it out here.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Creators on the Rise: Celestial Sylvia reads the danger all around us

Welcome to Creators on the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are…

17 hours ago

TikTok, UMG re-up licensing agreement, bringing artists like Bad Bunny back to the app

TikTok and Universal Music Group (UMG) have settled their dispute. The two parties have agreed on a…

18 hours ago

TikTok is bringing “tentpole moments” to its premium ad product Pulse Premiere

Amidst political turmoil in the U.S. and abroad, TikTok addressed brand and agency representatives at the 2024 NewFronts.…

19 hours ago

With 500,000 sellers in the U.S. alone, TikTok touts the safety features of its Shop

Amidst a chaotic week at TikTok, the app took some time to acknowledge its growing community…

2 days ago

Wesley Wang’s viral short film got 4.4 million views. A feature adaptation is in the works.

Nothing, Except Everything is getting a big-screen treatment. That's the name of a short film that…

2 days ago

Creators on the Rise: Giulia Amato on faith, finding her niche, and getting up at 4 a.m.

Welcome to Creators on the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are…

2 days ago