Recent Study Shows What It Takes To Be A YouTube Star

What do the top YouTube channels have in common? What do they all do? What do none of them do? These questions (and many, many others) were answered in a recent study conducted by a group of students at Columbia College in Chicago. The study analyzes the top 241 YouTube channels, breaking them down a million different ways in order to uncover the practices that allowed them to acquire such large fanbases.

YouTube is often thought of as a place where short videos thrive, but the site’s top contributors don’t tend to keep things so brief. The average video length among the top channels is 4:19, well above the snappy runtime we associate with YouTube. At first, this number seems skewed by gaming Let’s Play videos and makeup tutorials, both of which are common in the top channels and often run for more than ten minutes. However, even videos from popular comedy channels have an average length of 3:25. In terms of accruing subscribers, this data suggests that producing regular episodic content is more important that keeping it brief.

Another interesting nugget from the study discusses YouTube ‘trends’ such as the ‘Harlem Shake’. The study looked at several recent videos from the top creators and determined the ratio of comments to views. The most engaging channels had about 10% as many comments as views. On the other hand, two notable creators, The Fine Bros

and Shane Dawson, found themselves with  a view/comment ratio of less than .1%. The study explains that these low ratios occurred because the studied videos were Harlem Shake videos rather than regular content. This fact creates an interesting dynamic: While following trends on YouTube can bring in outside viewers who are interested in the latest fad, such a practice does a poor job of actually engaging the audience. Instead, it is The Fine Bros’ and Shane Dawson’s regularly scheduled content that creates a passionate fanbase.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

These findings make it clear that, while shooting for virality can lead to short term success, those hoping to gain subscribers must focus on producing a consistent product. There is much more data in the study; were I to analyze all of it, I’d end up looking like Charles Darwin. Peruse it at your leisure by checking it out here.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

YouTube just made a Shorts deepfake machine so creators don’t have to be in their own videos

Hey YouTubers! Do you want to be rid of the pesky chore of actually appearing…

22 hours ago

Have you heard? Gaming Historian says so long, Ms. Rachel sells shoes, and TikTok ad exec moves on.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

22 hours ago

NAB Show wants to be the meeting ground for creators and legacy entertainment: “These two segments have so much to offer each other right now”

Back in 2024, the National Association of Broadcasters recognized the importance of content creators by…

23 hours ago

Hoorae returns to Issa Rae’s web series roots with “Screen Time” microdrama

Too much screen time can be a dangerous thing, and Hoorae is taking that idea literally. The…

1 day ago

Kylie Jenner brings “star power and aura” to hydration product k2o, launched in tandem with Night

The latest product backed by Night's venture studio emerged out of a partnership between the creator…

1 day ago

Hollywood has a lot to learn from creator animators (and their IPs), YouTube says in latest Culture & Trends report

Indie animation is flourishing on YouTube. From the pop culture juggernaut that is The Amazing…

2 days ago