Twitch

Twitch is trying out new sponsorship tools. Streamers are less than thrilled.

Twitch‘s decision

to change its creator/platform revenue split from 70/30 (in favor of creators) to 50/50 continues to haunt it.

In an April 4 Twitter thread, Twitch said it’s conducting several “experiments” related to sponsored content, where brands partner up with creators and sponsor their streams. Plenty of Twitch streamers already regularly hold sponsored streams, and secure those brand partners themselves–meaning they get all the revenue from their deals.

Streamers say Twitch’s new experiments are an attempt to take a cut of that sponsorship revenue for itself.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

Experiments include:

  • Streamer-Read Ads, which “support streamers in delivering branded talking points live and across multiple streams,” per Twitch. It added, “This test is a part of our ongoing work to help streamers deliver ads natively in stream, themselves.”
  • Sub Codes, which “let brands pay for subs, and share the codes with viewers off Twitch. Viewers redeem the codes on Twitch and receive tokens that they can use to subscribe to their favorite channels.”
  • Sponsored Gift Subs, which “allow brands to buy and gift subs in Chat to viewers at scale.”
  • and Sponsored Sub Discounts, which “will offer SUBtember-like discounts for subscriptions on individual channels subs. Just like SUBtember, brands sponsor these discounts, allowing streamers to receive their regular payout for subs even though viewers pay a reduced rate.”

With Streamer-Read Ads, it’s not clear exactly how much Twitch would get, or how the tool would work. It could be a creator marketplace-esque feature, where Twitch matches brands up with streamers and then takes an overall cut for arranging the deal.

With the other three features, it’s clearer that Twitch would at least get a 50% cut from all those potential Sub Codes, Sponsored Sub Discounts, and Sponsored Gift Subs. Those will all bring in $4.99+ a pop, with half going to the streamer and half going to Twitch. (They’ll generate even more revenue if brands gift Tier 2 or Tier 3 subs, which are $9.99 and $24.99, respectively.)

Responses to Twitch’s thread about these experiments are largely negative, with many streamers airing grievances about how much of their revenue Twitch takes for itself.

Twitch hasn’t responded to creators’ concerns. In its thread about the new tools, it said they are “very early experiments, with the goal of finding what works best for streamers, viewers, and brands. Depending on feedback, some of these may change or scale further as we move into next year, and some may not.”

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: twitch

Recent Posts

Have you heard? Kurzgesagt is not AI, John Nellis goes dancing, and Baby Shark’s K-pop idol.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

14 hours ago

As social media lawsuits move forward, is Section 230 facing an existential threat?

In 2026, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is celebrating its 30th birthday. At…

15 hours ago

The World Cup put creators on the broadcast. Can KSI replicate that strategy for the club he co-owns?

When Greater London soccer club Dagenham & Redbridge FC begins its campaign for the 2026-27 season,…

18 hours ago

Spotify is cracking down on AI slop, but prompters can still post their generated music if they build a personal brand around it

Spotify is adding its own "seems like AI slop" button. Like YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, and…

1 day ago

OnlyFans investor says it will “never use AI in any capacity to disrupt creators”

OnlyFans' newest investor is talking up his future plans for the platform--including promising that it…

1 day ago

Influencer endorsements have created a campaign finance loophole. A proposed law would close it.

At this point, it's become clear that social media creators will play pivotal roles in…

2 days ago