The Supreme Court Declines To Hear Capitol Records’ Copyright Appeal Against Vimeo

A major court decision from last year looks like it will hold up. The Supreme Court has decided not to hear an appeal brought by Capitol Records against the online video site Vimeo. Instead, the 2016 decree handed down by 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals on this matter will stand, thus maintaining the broad range of protections sites like Vimeo receive under the “safe harbor” provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.

Capitol sued Vimeo in 2009 in an attempt to poke holes in safe harbor, which protects Vimeo and its video hosting brethren from being legally responsible for copyright-infringing material shared by their users, so long as the sites themselves respond in an expedient manner when rights holders request takedowns of that material. After winning an initial decision, Capitol lost on appeal.

Part of Capitol’s case had to do with the relationship between pre-1972 recordings and safe harbor. While those tracks are subject to individual state laws rather than federal law, the appeals court’s ruling said safe harbor

still applied. “Service providers would be compelled either to incur heavy costs of monitoring every posting to be sure it did not contain infringing pre-1972 recordings,” the court’s decision read, “or incurring potentially crushing liabilities under state copyright laws.”

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

A few months after the initial pro-Capitol decision was overturned, the label appeal to he Supreme Court with respect to the ruling on pre-1972 recordings. “[T]he Second Circuit’s decision…diminishes the legal protections enjoyed by owners of every sound recording made in the United States prior to February 15, 1972 — including among them works of immense cultural and commercial significance like those of The Temptations and The Supremes, Miles Davis, Ella Fitzgerald, Frank Sinatra, Pablo Casals, and Yehudi Menuhin, to name just a few,” read Capitol’s petition.

The Supreme Court, however, declined to rule on this point, and so the 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals decision will stand. For Vimeo, YouTube, and other similar sites, that’s great news.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Top 5 Branded Videos of the Week: MrBeast’s latest sponsored smash is fun for all ages

MrBeast continues to show us that he's in a league of his own as far as…

6 hours ago

Chas Stahl joins Get Engaged’s GEM Studios to lead development of creator brands and IPs

Jellysmack and StyleHaul alum Chas Stahl has joined GEM Studios, the digital content production wing…

6 hours ago

Rejoice, John Oliver fans: HBO is making full seasons of ‘Last Week Tonight’ free on YouTube

John Oliver appreciates that his fans can watch his late-night show on YouTube, and Last Week Tonight fans are…

8 hours ago

Soccer media brand Footballco is coming to America with several key hires

Footballco is betting on the growth of soccer in the United States. Over the past few…

3 days ago

MatPat-founded Theorist reveals new apparel brand at ‘Creator in Fashion’ show

As the co-host of the Creators in Fashion show that took place on April 25, Matthew Patrick (a.k.a. MatPat)…

3 days ago

Millionaires: Nicole Coenen is the internet’s favorite lesbian lumberjack

Welcome to Millionaires, where we profile creators who have recently crossed the one million follower…

3 days ago