Categories: ArticlesHBONews

HBO Subscription Service To Be Priced As “Premium Product”

In October 2014, HBO announced plans for its own web video service. So far, few details have been revealed about the offering. However, in a call with analysts on February 11, 2015, the network famous for shows like Game of Thrones and Girls finally hinted at the cost of its upcoming subscription service.

HBO still didn’t reveal exact numbers for its subscription service, but its top exec mentioned how the network views the service as prime. “It’s a premium product and it will be priced accordingly,” said HBO Chairman and CEO Richard Plepler on the call, as reported by Variety.

How much will it cost? Jeffrey Cole has a few ideas. Cole is the Director of the Center for the Digital Future at the USC Annenberg School for Communication and Journalism. Cole spoke at the Interactive Advertising Bureau Annual Leadership Meeting on February 10 in Phoenix, where he explained how HBO currently costs $15 a month per cable subscriber. The network takes home half of that (the other $7.50 goes to the cable company), and therefore, Cole thinks HBO should charge $12 a month.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

“At $12, they make an extra $4.50 per month per subscriber,” he said. “The consumer saves $3, and everybody’s a winner.” Cole said he attended a meeting with HBO executives, who wouldn’t confirm any pricing. But the USC Director believes the subscription service price will be “somewhere between $18 and $20, more than [subscribers] pay for [HBO] through cable, even though there’s no cable company to take a cut of it.”

HBO also has not revealed any official release date for the product. On the analyst call, HBO did confirm it still plans to deliver the streaming service in 2015 as previously planned. The network told Fortune the service would hopefully be available on April 6, the same date as the Game of Thrones season four premiere.

Despite the general consumer base not knowing much about HBO’s yet-unreleased service, Plepler told analysts he’s not worried about potential subscribers losing interest and tuning into other networks like FX or other video subscription companies like Amazon and Netflix. “It’s true there’s a plethora of competition out there, but it’s also true that more is not better,” he said. “Only better is better.”

Share
Published by
Bree Brouwer

Recent Posts

Have you heard? Kurzgesagt is not AI, John Nellis goes dancing, and Baby Shark’s K-pop idol.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

22 hours ago

As social media lawsuits move forward, is Section 230 facing an existential threat?

In 2026, Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 is celebrating its 30th birthday. At…

23 hours ago

The World Cup put creators on the broadcast. Can KSI replicate that strategy for the club he co-owns?

When Greater London soccer club Dagenham & Redbridge FC begins its campaign for the 2026-27 season,…

1 day ago

Spotify is cracking down on AI slop, but prompters can still post their generated music if they build a personal brand around it

Spotify is adding its own "seems like AI slop" button. Like YouTube, Instagram, LinkedIn, and…

2 days ago

OnlyFans investor says it will “never use AI in any capacity to disrupt creators”

OnlyFans' newest investor is talking up his future plans for the platform--including promising that it…

2 days ago

Influencer endorsements have created a campaign finance loophole. A proposed law would close it.

At this point, it's become clear that social media creators will play pivotal roles in…

2 days ago