Will Twitter Enter The Market With Its Own Video Hosting Service?

People dig Twitter. I used to not ‘get’ its appeal, but now I understand: you can learn what your tech-savvy uncle had for lunch, effectively market a product, or just laugh at your favorite feeds (the debates would not have been nearly as funny without @SilentJimLehrer, and that’s a FACT.) However, despite the fact that everyone loves it, Twitter can’t make money. Could taking control of video posted to the website be the solution Twitter is looking for? The social media giant is considering adding its own in-house video service, wresting power away from third party companies such as TwitVid.

This change would make sense for Twitter for several reasons. By the current setup, it is third parties, and not Twitter, who make ad revenue from videos posted to the site. What worsens the problem, as this exhaustive article notes, is that users often conflate the third-party apps with Twitter, and complain to Twitter directly when something on TwitVid gets changed or doesn’t work. Therefore, Twitter has to deal with the negatives of the video services it supports without getting to reap any of the benefits.

In addition, video hosting is a great way to get extra reach and revenue out of a large social media user base. Just a few years after Facebook

launched its homegrown video hosting service, it rose to second place in comScore’s rankings as users watched over 1.2 billion minutes of video in one month alone. Though Facebook has since fallen back to earth a little bit, users still watched over 768 million minutes in August, according to the newest com Score rankings. If Twitter can use a first-party platform to drive even a fraction of this engagement (and, given its huge user base, it certainly can), it can easily turn the time people spend on Twitter into cold, hard $$$.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

This is still just a rumor, but it definitely seems like something Twitter should go through with ASAP. This solution would only factor in content from other video sharing sites, but perhaps down the road Twitter will even work its way into the premium content space; it already has lots of neat stuff on its YouTube channel.

Several feeds on the site have spawned their own promo videos and web series; who’s to say that Twitter themselves can’t get involved in the feed-to-show process?

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

A new gamer on Twitch is so ‘OP’ that he’s taking on some of the biggest esports stars

Sandisk is challenging Twitch streamers to take on a masked gamer whose skills will shine across…

6 hours ago

A rumored FTC complaint would accuse YouTube of misrepresenting its content moderation policies

Do YouTube users have a clear understanding of the platform's policies when they sign up? Or are…

6 hours ago

Will they or won’t they? The Chicago Cubs’ TikTok rom-com could be a punchline or a sign of the times.

Will the next sports romance sensation come from TikTok? The Chicago Cubs are looking to hit a…

8 hours ago

Here’s how Collab used licensed clips and human voiceovers to turn Rufus Goodboy into YouTube’s best-in-show animal compilation channel

Thanks to its core business--collecting, licensing, managing, and protecting the usage rights of user-generated content--Collab…

9 hours ago

Markiplier thinks GoPro’s new $699 camera is the key to accessible filmmaking. (Also, he’s now GoPro’s biggest shareholder.)

This past April, Markiplier went to GoPro's booth at NAB Show in Las Vegas, hoping…

1 day ago

As AI becomes more powerful, Google cautions YouTube advertisers not to lose their human touch

In 2026, YouTube and Google have put AI at the center of their joint pitch to brand partners. AI-powered…

1 day ago