Categories: Tilzy.TV

'Can We Do That?' Can't Do It…For Now

Online video is the Wild West. To ride with the hackneyed, clichéd, but accurate metaphor, there are independent trailblazers like Rocketboom, Ask a Ninja, and ZeFrank that found and worked their own plot of land to prosperous gain, there are old conglomerates with new names like Hulu and Crackle that are trying to move into the newly established space with a sense of manifest destiny and, of course, there are those pioneers who made an early trek across new media’s Gold Rush Trail only to succumb to exhaustion along the way.

Cory Tyler, Ski-ter, and Charles Carpenter represent the latter. The good-looking, charmingly creative threesome behind the bi-weekly, ad-agency spoofing comedy series Can We Do That? (Tilzy.TV page) told Sunny Gault of Veoh’s Viral (Tilzy.TV page) that they’d be taking a production break. The show is meticulously based around wrangling a sponsor, and they just weren’t able to rope one into the corral. ###

The principals all have relatively successful acting careers in Hollywood, but they didn’t come to the internet with the rigidity you’d expect from old media vets. Instead, the three men used their experience to create a show with a formula that seemed ripe for Internet success.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

Amusingly risqué scripts with precarious situations are packed into well-acted, fast-moving, bite-sized episodes. Curvaceous dancing models act as hooks to draw viewers’ intrigue. Faux product placements and “Sponsored by….” spots imitate the real thing, giving potential advertisers an idea of what they could get for their buck. And a frequent, earnest outreach to fans to participate in the show displayed a sense of community and support for its viewers.

So what went wrong? Timing.

There’s a significant amount of investment currently going on in the online video space, and new media production companies like Vuguru, 60Frames, and Next New Networks are betting relatively big dollars on content creation for the web.  But having started production of this seemingly successful web series in April 2006, I think the guys just hit their stride too soon.  Pioneers in an open space that were a little too early for their own good.  Hopefully, they’ll be back.  

Share
Published by
Joshua Cohen

Recent Posts

Soccer media brand Footballco is coming to America with several key hires

Footballco is betting on the growth of soccer in the United States. Over the past few…

1 day ago

MatPat-founded Theroist reveals new apparel brand at ‘Creator in Fashion’ show

As the co-host of the Creators in Fashion show that took place on April 25, Matthew Patrick (a.k.a. MatPat)…

1 day ago

YouTube salutes its Shorts as ad revenue soars to $8.1 billion in Q1 2024

Alphabet's earnings report for the first quarter of 2024 sent its stock price soaring sky-high.…

1 day ago

Snap stock jumps 25% after Q1 earnings beat projections. Also, 9 million people are now paying for Snapchat+.

Snap has had a rocky couple of years: several quarters of flat growth or declines,…

1 day ago

On the Rise: Rob can heal your workplace wounds

Welcome to On the Rise, where we find and profile breakout creators who are in…

2 days ago

Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint launch Spy Ninjas HQ, the first adventure park built on a YouTube IP

Four years ago, Chad Wild Clay and Vy Qwaint had an idea. They had spent…

2 days ago