YouTube has pledged to reduce the amount of so-called AI slop on its platform, and its activity early in 2026 shows that it’s taking that responsibility seriously. According to a report from video editing software company Kapwing, at least 18 channels that published AI slop have either been deleted or have had their videos hidden.
The channels targeted in YouTube’s crackdown include some of the most popular producers of AI slop. CuentosFacianantes, which uploaded content Kapwing previously described as “low-quality Dragon Ball-themed videos,” amassed more than 1.2 billion views before its recent disappearance from YouTube. Another channel no longer available on YouTube, Imperio de Jesus, cracked our Global Top 50 ranking amid a wave of religious AI slop.
Though YouTube has taken action against some AI slop channels, that genre remains prevalent on the platform. Our most recent Global Top 50 chart included multiple purveyors of AI slop, including Riki TV and Rbrain Project.
Subscribe to get the latest creator news
For a while, AI slop channels were allowed to operate with relative impunity. They only seemed to receive the banhammer when they flagrantly broke YouTube rules.
In 2025, however, the AI slop problem became too big to ignore. Hollywood studios became implicated in the mess, and advertisers threatened to pull dollars from YouTube unless a thorough cleanup occurred. YouTube responded by vowing to limit the monetization of unoriginal and repetitive content — a category that certainly includes AI slop.
Neal Mohan reiterated the importance of that crackdown in an open letter he authored at the start of 2026. “To reduce the spread of low quality AI content, we’re actively building on our established systems that have been very successful in combatting spam and clickbait, and reducing the spread of low quality, repetitive content,” Mohan wrote.
In the same missive, Mohan also discussed some of the AI-powered products YouTube plans to roll out in 2026, and therein lies the rub. On YouTube, AI has become an inescapable force that affects videos both in front of and behind the camera. Google’s Veo engine is now so advanced that it can generate videos that are almost indistinguishable from creator content. With a product like that available to the masses, is it even possible for YouTube to significantly limit AI slop? Or is the genre akin to a hydra that sprouts two more heads every time one is chopped off?
Since YouTube’s inception, those tricky moderation questions have been hard to answer. Efforts to cull rule-breaking content have often had unintended consequences that make life difficult for law-abiding creators. The speed and quality of today’s generative AI models makes it even harder to stay ahead of the bad actors, but it’s good to see that YouTube is not ignoring the large library of AI slop it has incubated.
