Fortnite

No bots here: Epic sues two game developers after paying them “tens of thousands of dollars” for alleged fake engagement

There’s been a lot of talk about viewbots lately. That talk is mostly centered around Twitch and Kick and their efforts (with varying degrees of success) to keep streamers from fluffing their viewership numbers with fake engagement.

But there’s another platform that’s taking the most aggressive stance yet: Fortnite maker Epic Games, which just filed suit against two developers, alleging they used bots to boost their Islands’ traffic.

Quick context for those who might not be familiar: Epic offers its game creation engine, Unreal Editor for Fortnite, to game developers of all sizes, letting them use its power and assets to make their own digital destinations within the Fortnite platform. Other players can then visit these destinations–aka Islands–to do things like explore the landscape and buildings and play new game modes or minigames. Epic then pays developers per month based on how much engagement their Islands generate (and, soon, how many in-game items they sell).

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

Okay, back to the lawsuit: Epic says the developers, Michigan-based Idris Nahdi and Ayob Nasser, created over 20,000 fake bot accounts and sent them off to each other’s Islands, artificially inflating the Islands’ engagement. Between them, they had 10 active Islands, and the bots were not deployed to any other Islands–just each other’s.

That artificial engagement resulted in Epic paying the duo “tens of thousands of dollars” for traffic that was not real, the suit alleges.

Epic says that over 80% of the engagement on Nahdi and Nasser’s Islands was fake, rising up to 99% at times. Its official claims are breach of contract, copyright infringement, and fraud.

The suit aims to recover what Epic paid for the alleged fake engagement, plus damages, and asks the judge to permaban Nahdi and Nasser from Fortnite and every other Epic Games IP/server.

Epic has been litigious before, successfully suing hack sellers, DDoSers, and cheating players, so we’re not surprised it went the legal route with this issue, too.

However this case shakes out, it’s a clear indication that Epic is keeping a close eye on its game developer/creator population as it continues to expand their power within Fortnite. Like we mentioned above, Epic plans to introduce the ability for developers to sell digital items this coming December, bringing it closer in line with competitor Roblox and giving creators more opportunities to make money. Obviously Epic plans to make sure that when it pays that money out, the creators actually earned it.

Share
Published by
James Hale

Recent Posts

Jordan Matter, Michelle Khare, and Samir Chaudry are strategic advisors at a new creator education startup

As our industry becomes ever more populated by experts, and in the absence of collaborative…

16 hours ago

YouTube says Premium subscribers are “podcast super-users.” So it’s giving them more exclusive listening features.

With the amount of attention audio content is getting lately, we might as well rebrand…

17 hours ago

Have you heard? PewDiePie drops vlogs, Spy Ninjas spends $25 million, and Jason Kelce gets a YouTube show

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

18 hours ago

Netflix and Spotify just paid $100 million to take Jay Shetty’s podcast off YouTube

Netflix has visited the farm once again. The streamer and Spotify have together poached Jay…

2 days ago

What’s on the menu for the Sidemen? A cooking competition split between YouTube and Prime Video.

The creator supergroup that revived Supermarket Sweep on YouTube is ordering up another culinary competition.…

2 days ago

Meta officially offers perks for paying subscribers across Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp

Meta is establishing paid subscription tiers across its network of social media platforms. A trio…

2 days ago