TikTok

Senators Challenge TikTok Over Plans To Collect Users’ Face And Voiceprints

Congress is once again challenging TikTok.

News that the platform has changed its terms of service to allow the collection of faceprints and voiceprints has prompted concerns from both Democrat and Republican lawmakers this week.

Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) and John Thune (R-SD) are asking TikTok to respond to a number of concerns by Aug. 25–namely what biometric data it’s collecting from users, and what it plans to do with that data.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

TikTok changed its privacy policy on June 2 to state that it “may collect biometric identifiers and biometric information as defined under US laws, such as faceprints and voiceprints.” This change appears to have been made quietly, with no announcement or other highlighting from TikTok.

Klobuchar and Thune, in a letter to TikTok’s CEO Shou Zi Chew, said they are particularly concerned with whether biometric data will be scraped from users under 18.

“The coronavirus pandemic led to an increase in online activity, which has magnified the need to protect consumers’ privacy,” the senators wrote. “This is especially true for children and teenagers, who comprise more than 32 percent of TikTok’s active users and have relied on online applications such as TikTok for entertainment and for interaction with their friends and loved ones.”

Klobuchar and Thune’s letter asks TikTok to explicitly define what it means by “faceprint” and “voiceprint,” and to state: whether data will be collected from users under 18; whether collected data will be shared with third parties; how long data will be stored after it’s collected; and whether faceprints/voiceprints can be used to accurately suss out identifying data about users, like age, gender, race, and ethnicity.

The letter also asks TikTok to say whether its recommendation algorithm will use the faceprints/voiceprints to serve content and/or ads, and asks for a list of all entities that will have access to users’ biometric data.

Tubefilter has reached out to TikTok for comment on the letter, and will update this story with any new information.

It’s absolutely worth mentioning here that TikTok just paid $92 million to settle a class-action lawsuit from 21 U.S.-based plaintiffs who alleged it illegally harvested underage users’ data–including scans of their faces–to feed its recommendation algorithm.

Share
Published by
James Hale
Tags: tiktok

Recent Posts

Have you heard? MrBeast’s Shark Tank spot, Minecraft goes after Roblox, and a robo racoon gets us in the mood for spooky season

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

2 days ago

The last thing creators add, the first thing viewers notice: Why Adobe is introducing music, speech, and sound effect generation to Firefly

In 2023, Photoshop developer Adobe jumped into generative AI with its launch of Firefly. Firefly…

2 days ago

Live Nation is capitalizing on the creator economy with a new firm

Ticketmaster parent Live Nation is getting into the creator biz. The publicly traded multinational corp,…

3 days ago

Netflix gets a bite of ‘Chicken Shop Date’

Netflix is getting a bucket of Chicken Shop Date. Amelia Dimoldenberg's long-running flirty-casual interview series…

3 days ago

Surprise: Neon is also making an SCP Foundation film, but correctly

Neon, the production company behind films like Parasite, Longlegs, and Anora, has decided it's going…

4 days ago

Noel Miller on why TMG Studios is breaking into fictional podcasts–and why it won’t touch gen AI

"If we're the last human-led media channel and everything else is prompted and generated in…

4 days ago