Celebrity

Jake Paul Dropped By Legal Firm In Case Involving Prank That Damaged Man’s Hearing

Jake Paul has been dropped by legal firm Loeb & Loeb for being difficult to work with and failing to make payment for services.

Court documents show that a Los Angeles judge recently approved the firm’s request to be relieved as Paul’s defense counsel in the case of Ellis Barbacoff vs Jake Paul et al, where the YouTube star is being sued for negligence, emotional distress, and battery.

The case was filed in 2017. Its plaintiff, Barbacoff, alleges that Paul and Team 10 members Kyler Fisher and Nathan Speiser (who are also named as defendants in the suit, as well as Team 10 generally and Jake Paul Productions, Inc.) damaged his hearing using a train horn that had been kitted to Paul’s car. The trio can be seen blaring the horn to scare passersby in Paul’s vlog Embarrassing Billboard Prank On My Brother (He Freaked), uploaded on July 7, 2017.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

Barbacoff is seeking an undisclosed amount in damages; court documents show that at least some of that money will be used for medical bills, as Barbacoff has had to seek medical treatment and will have to continue receiving treatment in the future, he alleges.

Loeb & Loeb attorney Barry E. Mallen

filed his motion to be relieved as Paul’s counsel back in October, describing the situation as “an irreconcilable breakdown in the attorney-client relationship.” Specific allegations against Paul state that “since the inception” of the lawsuit, he’s “refused to cooperate with Loeb” and has “refused to make payments to Loeb for [its] legal services.”

Notes in the motion also indicate that when Paul, Fisher, Speiser, Team 10, and Jake Paul Productions were notified that Loeb & Loeb intended to petition the court to be removed as their counsel, only Fisher responded.

Loeb & Loeb’s motion was approved on Jan. 3, and as of Jan. 10, the firm no longer represents Paul. Another document, filed with the court on Dec. 19, shows that Paul is now represented by James P. Lemieux of the firm Demler, Armstrong & Rowland.

You can read Barbacoff’s original complaint, as well as the motion for relief filed by Loeb & Loeb, in full below.

Original complaint:

ELLIS BARBACOFF vs JAKE PAU… by on Scribd

Motion for relief:

ELLIS BARBACOFF vs JAKE PAU… by on Scribd

Share
Published by
James Hale

Recent Posts

Reed Hastings leaves Netflix, which says it “really built our M&A muscle” during failed deal with Warner Bros. Discovery

There's just no winning with Netflix shareholders. After it reported 2025's Q4 earnings in January,…

4 hours ago

TikTok is turning ByteDance’s AI video generator in a brand’s best friend

As one AI-powered video generator bites the dust, another is being integrated into one of…

4 hours ago

Former OnlyFans CEO’s new platform goes softcore to become “the HBO of social media”

April is the Vylit hour in the world of social media. That's the name of a new…

4 hours ago

Nas Daily’s AI ecom biz just closed a $27 million round led by Vinod Khosla

Nas Daily is jumping on the AI bandwagon. He's raised a $27 million Series A…

4 hours ago

Sick of slop? YouTube now has a workaround that effectively turns off Shorts.

YouTube already lets its users put a hard stop on their watch time each day, and…

6 hours ago

Courts and governments say social platforms harm teens’ mental health. Here’s what the teens think.

Are major social media platforms safe for teens? The answer to that question could have…

1 day ago