Why Hulu Needs To (But Can’t) Be Sold

The internet and entertainment industries are all abuzz because “people familiar with the matter” told the Wall Street Journal Hulu is considering selling itself after being approached with an unsolicited offer. That unsolicited offer may or may not have come from Yahoo, but regardless of who made it, it reportedly caused Hulu’s board to do some soliciting of its own and gauge interest about a sale to a private equity firms or other large company.

Janko Roettgers at GigaOm put together a comprehensive list of possible Hulu buyers and Will Richmond at VideoNuze wrote up a great post about why Hulu can’t possibly sell to any of them. Hulu’s greatest asset is its “exclusive next-day distribution deals with its studio/broadcast TV network owners.” The value of the premium, on demand, streaming video service is in its content (and, to a certain degree, its ability to monetize the heck out of that content) and the reason Hulu gets content deals par excellence from News Corporation, Disney, and NBC is because those entertainment conglomerates have a stake in the company. If Hulu is sold, there’s no inherent incentive for its owners to continue with favorable distribution terms.

But, the fact that Hulu is owned by three separate and competing global entertainment corporations is exactly the reason the company should consider selling itself. There are too many executives sitting in the corner office with decision-making influence or power and seemingly congruent, but probably conflicting agendas.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

Obviously, I’m not privy to what goes on in the Hulu board room, but from the vantage point of someone who pays attention to these things, it seems like Hulu CEO Jason Kilar has had his fair share of headaches and battles with Hulu’s investors. (Part of the reported reason Hulu recently dropped its plans for an IPO was because its owners couldn’t decide on the company’s strategy.)  Despite (or maybe because of) Kilar’s difference of opinion with the Hulu powers that be, he’s been able to make the company profitable and on pace to make $500 million in revenue by the end of 2011.

So, what’s Hulu to do? Should it sell to the highest bidder and do its best to maintain as many favorable distribution contracts as possible? Or does it stay the course and run the risk of becoming the MySpace to Netflix’s (or some other company’s) Facebook due to too much friction at the top. I don’t know! But it’ll be interesting to see what happens next.

Share
Published by
Joshua Cohen

Recent Posts

Could a free tier be coming to Disney Plus?

It’s no secret that streaming services are struggling to keep pace with YouTube. Google’s video…

3 days ago

Have you heard? MrBeast dives into ‘Shark Tank’ and Kick enters the Octagon.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

3 days ago

Meta’s latest feature uses Instagram content for AI fodder. SAG-AFTRA and CAA aren’t happy.

Update: Meta has reversed course in response to community backlash. In an update posted July…

3 days ago

Netflix snags The Stokes Twins’ YouTube library as its next piece of creator content

Netflix is making another addition to its lineup of creator content, and this time, it's adding…

4 days ago

TikTok’s U.S. tour will serve as a reminder of its small business impact

The summer of 2026 includes the 250th birthday of the United States, but it's also…

4 days ago

A documentary shares the history of card collecting, and its creator-led future

You may remember the story of your first Pokémon card, but you probably don't know the story…

4 days ago