News

As Nvidia becomes world’s largest company, it’s looking to dismiss a creator lawsuit about AI training rights

The generative AI boom has been kind to Nvidia, and the chip maker is looking to consolidate its gains by striking down a lawsuit against it. Mirroring other tech companies like Google and OpenAI, Nvidia has filed a motion to dismiss a legal challenge from a plaintiff who believes that generative AI training practices infringe on creator rights.

As explained by Law360, Nvidia, Google, and OpenAI are the targets of three nearly identical lawsuits filed in a California federal court. The man behind those cases is David Millette, a Massachusetts man who is seeking more than $5 million in damage for himself and his fellow creators. Millette’s initial suit argues that the defendants are engaging in “surreptitious, non-consensual transcription of millions of YouTube users’ videos” to train large language models like Google’s Gemini.

Of the companies targeted by Millette’s suits, OpenAI was the first to follow a motion to dismiss, followed by Google and Nvidia about two months later. Nvidia’s filing argued that Millette’s claims of unjust enrichment and unfair competition are superseded by the Copyright Act.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

In addition, the big tech defendants are arguing that Millette has not shown that the defendants are causing him harm with their AI training practices. “The complaint offers no plausible basis to infer that Nvidia utilized Plaintiff’s videos to train its AI models,” reads the chip maker’s response.

Nvidia’s counter to Millette’s claim comes amidst a bull period for the Santa Clara-based tech company. Thanks to its leading position in the generative AI industry, Nvidia is now the largest company in the world, surpassing Apple.

The apparent holes in Millette’s suit make it hard to believe he will be able to successfully challenge defendants as big as Nvidia, Google, and OpenAI. But disputes between creators and large language model owners will come to a head one way or another. Creator criticisms of unregulated training data have become widespread, and Hollywood stars like Scarlett Johansson are also looking to hit back at AI limitations of their likeness.

Tech companies have repeatedly promised to do more to protect creators whose IP is repurposed to train AI models. It doesn’t look like Millette’s suit will be the catalyst that makes Big Tech follow through on those promises, but the plaintiff is drawing attention to the unchecked power of companies like Nvidia, which continue to grow bigger as AI competition heats up.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

YouTube hits nearly $10 billion in Q1 ad revenue

Alphabet's stock jumped more than 6% in after-hours trading following a strong quarterly earnings call--a…

7 hours ago

Kick gambling streamer N3on is spending millions on his army of clippers

Clipping is the content creator equivalent of a startup doing digital ads. And if you've…

9 hours ago

Australia limited teen access to social media. Now it’s trying to get a better deal for news media companies.

The Australian government has devised a new way to wring money out of social media…

9 hours ago

Can TikTok Shop disrupt the gallery by empowering creators to sell fine art pieces?

TikTok Shop's push into luxury goods isn't stopping with the $11,000 handbags it listed. Another…

10 hours ago

Patreon is prioritizing discovery. New short-form posts called Quips are part of the plan.

Back in 2024, Patreon announced its plan to bring a greater "network effect" to its platform. By…

11 hours ago

Top 5 Branded Videos of the Week: Yoshi egg, Pringles hack, alien ASMR

'Tis the season for festive holiday beverages, and some of YouTube's biggest channels are raising…

1 day ago