News

TikTok, Google, and Meta to face multiple lawsuits related to the mental health effects of algorithms

A recent decree could lead to more court time for three embattled Big Tech firms. In the U.S. District Court in Oakland, California, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that a group of lawsuits filed by school districts against TikTok, Google, and Meta can move forward.

According to Bloomberg, Rogers backed more than 150 cases filed by school districts, all of which concern the effect social media algorithms may have on the youth mental health crisis. For years, scholastic authorities have argued that tech platforms are liable for the harmful content their recommendation algorithms serve to teenage viewers.

The standard defense against those allegations invokes Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. That’s the title of a legal doctrine that provides “safe harbor” to platforms. As long as they act quickly to deal with violative content, they are exempt from legal liability. A ruling earlier this year supported platforms’ Section 230 rights, reinforcing a Supreme Court precedent and seemingly shielding them from prosecution in 600 cases related to addictive algorithms.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

But elsewhere in the legal world, there are questions about how and when Section 230 can be applied to algorithmic recommendations. A pivotal decision in August 2024 determined that TikTok will have to face a lawsuit

brought by the mother of a child who died after attempting the dangerous “blackout challenge.” That ruling built on a Supreme Court decision that defined recommendation algorithms as “editorial judgements” that may not qualify for Section 230 protections.

Judge Rogers ruled that some of the claims brought before her are invalid due to Section 230, but others should be allowed to move forward. Rogers said that TikTok, Google, and Meta “deliberately fostered compulsive use of their platforms which foreseeably caused” school districts to expend resources on mental health services for students.

The outcomes of these cases are far from certain, but if the courts continue to strip away Section 230’s authority in the realm of algorithms, the ramifications for social media industry would be massive. Who knows — maybe this time next year the U.S. will be getting depersonalized algorithms to match the ones they have in Europe.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Have you heard? A ‘Dead Meat’ meetup, Jake Paul’s re-raise, and the TikTok farlands.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

4 hours ago

YouTube Shorts has a new look that removes distractions and dislikes

It's hard to believe it's already been more than five years since YouTube Shorts was…

5 hours ago

Twitch partners with Soundcloud to put a new spin on DJ sets

Both YouTube and TikTok have flexed their music industry muscles by attaching their names to star-studded…

6 hours ago

Second Rodeo’s Scott Brown says a new age of creator-fronted scripted content is here–and vertical microseries like Playback are leading the charge

With microseries drawing big attention and big investment from startup studios and legacy entertainment entities…

22 hours ago

YouTube creator content now appears in 25% of AI chatbot responses

According to new research from Jellyfish, creators are becoming vital sources for AI chatbots, whether they…

1 day ago

The Knicks’ victory lap has scored billions of views. Advertisers should pay attention.

On June 13, the New York Knicks ended a 53-year title drought by defeating the San Antonio Spurs…

1 day ago