'The Phantom Menace Review' Explains Why Star Wars Prequels Suck

Everyone knows The Phantom Menace is a terrible movie. You know it. Little kids with Anakin backpacks know it. George Lucas knows it (as he swims through his pool of Star Wars licensed gold). Even prequel apologists like me know it.

So, does anyone really need a 70-minute video review to tell us why we hate such a mind-numbing piece of woefully disappointing cinema? Yes, at least when that review is produced by mad genius Mike Stoklasa of Red Letter Media.

Subscribe for daily Tubefilter Top Stories

Subscribe

Stoklasa’s review doesn’t simply trash The Phantom Menace, it explores the reasons the two Star Wars trilogies are so different, and examines the broader question of why some movies make people’s eyes glaze over in awe and other movies make them want to slit their wrists.

The Phantom Menace Review is conducted in the same style as other Red Letter Media reviews. It’s exhaustively illustrated with wall-to-wall footage from the film, features critiques from the perspective of an almost frightningly informed viewer, and narrated by a guy who kind of sounds like Brad Neeley if Brad Neeley was a backwoods codger who abducts and slaughters disoriented hikers. To clarify that last point, the narrator of RLM reviews is a character whose role is to sometimes stray from film critique and get into pitch black humor involving basement death chambers and eerily specific advice on how to kill prostitutes.

Fun as serial killer humor may be, the main reason to watch this review is for the review. Stoklasa points out tons of plotholes and poor dialogue, but the real insight comes from his examination of what connects a viewer to a movie. The first 10-mintute segment contains the sharpest piece of criticism in the whole 70-minute expose. Four average viewers are asked to describe the personality of certain Star Wars characters, and the ease with which they paint colorful adjective portraits of original trilogy characters like C-3PO (“prissy”, “anal-retenandtive”, “high-strung”) is contrasted with the near-impossible task of describing a main character from the prequels (Padme is best remembered as “monotone”).

Towards the end of the review, Stoklasa uses behind-the-scenes production footage of The Phantom Menace to examine the film’s problems at their source. Stoklasa concedes he can only speculate on what went wrong during filming, but his implications are clear when he asks us to see the fear in the eyes of Lucas’ production team, unable to question or critique their master.

The Phantom Menance Review has it share of cheap shots, nitpicks and tangents, but it ultimately gets closer than any other review or article to answering the question burning inside every Star Wars fan: How could one of the greatest movie franchises of all time get #$%@ed up so badly?

Share
Published by
Ana Hurka-Robles

Recent Posts

Explicit deepfakes are a monumental problem. Paris Hilton just published a TikTok series to combat them.

Paris Hilton has taken the fight against explicit deepfakes to TikTok. Her production company 11:11…

13 hours ago

Creators sit behind YouTube’s “Brand Deal Desk” to explain the secrets of their sponsorships

The creator economy is a $37 billion annual business, but that wealth is not split…

15 hours ago

After forging his own path, how far can Stephen Colbert go on YouTube and TikTok?

After hosting his final episode of CBS' long-running Late Show, Stephen Colbert made an unsurprising…

16 hours ago

YouTube is making AI labels easier to read (and applying them automatically)

At this point, AI-generated content on YouTube is a fait accompli. Like it or not,…

17 hours ago

Netflix enters a new frontier with real-time syndication of ‘The Breakfast Club’

For years, Netflix has wanted to make its name as the home of ultra-premium content.…

1 day ago

Top 5 Branded Videos of the Week: Movie moments

'Tis the season for festive holiday beverages, and some of YouTube's biggest channels are raising…

2 days ago