News

Judge Rules In YouTube’s Favor In Zombie Go Boom’s Adpocalypse Lawsuit

When they filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California last July, creators James Sweet and Chuck Meré hoped to compel YouTube to reveal the means by which it selects videos for monetization. Unfortunately for them, the judge in their case has now ruled in YouTube’s favor. U.S. District Judge Edward Chen defended YouTube’s right to pull monetization privileges as it sees fit, stating that the platform “is not obligated to display any advertisements alongside your videos.”

Sweet and Meré are the owners of the Zombie Go Boom channel, which has more than 1.7 million subscribers. In their videos, they use all sorts of weapons to unload on dummies, making their brand of content inherently violent. When YouTube demonetized a large number of violent videos as part of a large-scale effort known as the “adpocalypse,” Zombie Go Boom was hit particularly hard. In their initial complaint, the channel’s owners said they lost 90% to 95% of their ad revenue.

Subscribe to get the latest creator news

Subscribe

The goal of the lawsuit was to compel YouTube to reveal the means by which it selects videos for demonetization. “YouTube has a duty to disclose, with detailed specificity and complete transparency, the terms by which content is selected or deselected for monetization,” read the complaint. “Failing to disclose this essential information to content providers, along with maintaining unilateral control to change the terms and conditions which govern the payment received by content providers for their creative work is anti-competitive, harmful to the creative content market, and also a breach of good faith and fair dealing.”

The lawsuit was always going to be an uphill battle, because YouTube says in its terms of service that it may change its policies at any time. Citing that truth, Chen rebuked Sweet and Meré’s claim.

If there’s a silving lining for the creators, its that YouTube may soon improve the accuracy of the automated processes that select videos for demonetization. The video site said last October that new technology will result in 30% fewer “false positives” among clips that are deemed unfriendly for advertisers.

Share
Published by
Sam Gutelle

Recent Posts

Top 5 Branded Videos of the Week: Best buyin’

'Tis the season for festive holiday beverages, and some of YouTube's biggest channels are raising…

6 hours ago

Thinking about going to VidSummit 2026? Here are two full keynotes from 2025 as a taste of what you’ll get.

Always wanted to attend VidSummit, but never quite managed to get there? Now's your chance to…

7 hours ago

YouTube hopes stricter ad eligibility requirements will make Shorts revenue “meaningful” for creators

Beginning on February 1, 2027, the benchmarks for ad revenue eligibility on YouTube will be updated. Creators will…

12 hours ago

40% of LinkedIn posts are AI slop. It’s adding a button for users to flag them…and a separate tool for people to have AI “proofread” their posts.

Recent data from AI/plagiarism detector Pangram showed that 41% of long-form posts and 30% of…

20 hours ago

MySpace’s owners want to bring it back. But does it belong in 2026?

We might get MySpace before we get GTA 6. Anyone aware of the internet in…

22 hours ago

Have you heard? Addison Rae has a Fortnite skin and Erling Haaland has a secret weapon.

Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…

3 days ago