Before he left The Hollywood Reporter for the greener pastures of Thrillist, Steve Bryant wrote a list of online video lessons learned. In said list is one of my favorite quotes about the medium: “Boobs evolved for thumbnails.”
No content producer or new media studio has cracked the code for internet success and strategies on how to make “Teh Best Webshow Evar!!!1!!” are in a perpetual state of flux (Where should you release your episodes? On what type of schedule? How long should they be? Does it have to be interactive? How interactive? Etc? Etc.).
But underneath all the trials and errors lies that tried and true TNA method of garnering an audience. Entire YouTube careers have been based on cleavage (see Athene Wins and Hot for Words) and it’s a well known phenomenon that in a regular old web series, the episodes with the most (or disproportionate) view counts are going to be the ones where the thumbnail is the most lascivious.
But that was the old YouTube. Now, there’s a new YouTube with quality standards that penalize the use of profanity and sexually suggestive material. A Youtube for all of us.
A post on YouTube’s blog outlines the new initiatives it will take to “make the collective YouTube experience even better” (for advertisers, not necessarily users).
As expected, this caused an outrage in the YouTube community, especially amongst its Producers with a history of gaming views.
Some made legitimate arguments that they need control of their thumbnails in order to properly brand their content. That’s a good point. Users who choose their thumbnail images not by cupsize but by relevance to their videos might become innocent victims within this new system. That sucks, but breasts shouldn’t be people’s biggest concern.
By algorithmically demoting content that’s sexually suggestive or contains profanity, YouTube is essentially censoring its users. It’s not full-blown censorship (probably nothing the NCAC is going to be up in arms about), but it’s still censorship. A difference of degree, not kind. And when does it end?
I realize YouTube needs to make money and attracting advertisers is easier when you promote content that’s “safe,” but does this mean the end is nigh for the say-whatever-you-want-it’s-the-Wild-West internet? In a few years will the site be a saccharine-coated candyland of family friendly content for Madison Ave.?
For further analaysis and deconstruction, check out YouTube Reviewed.
For years, Netflix has wanted to make its name as the home of ultra-premium content.…
'Tis the season for festive holiday beverages, and some of YouTube's biggest channels are raising…
Does generative AI represent the future of the film world, or is it an existential…
In its latest deal with TikTok, Universal Music Group said it's all about "[promoting] human…
Each week, we handpick a selection of stories to give you a snapshot of trends,…
Platforms like Patreon and OnlyFans let creators distribute paywalled videos that can only be watched…